Housing Crisis puts HUD Under Scrutiny - WA Post
Wednesday, June 11th, 2008Proof that hindsight is 20-20, a three-page report issued Tuesday, June 10, 2008, by the Washington Post made it clear that HUD is currently in the spotlight, given how many of their borrowers have entered or lost their homes to foreclosure. Not only are real estate professionals looking in their direction and shaking their heads, but now Congress is expected to consider changing HUD’s regulatory responsibilities, as well.
Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
“In 2004, as regulators warned that subprime lenders were saddling borrowers with mortgages they could not afford, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development helped fuel more of that risky lending.
“Eager to put more low-income and minority families into their own homes, the agency required that two government-chartered mortgage finance firms purchase far more “affordable” loans made to these borrowers. HUD stuck with an outdated policy that allowed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to count billions of dollars they invested in subprime loans as a public good that would foster affordable housing.
“Housing experts and some congressional leaders now view those decisions as mistakes that contributed to an escalation of subprime lending that is roiling the U.S. economy.
[…]
“Congress is expected to vote before its Fourth of July recess on legislation that would strip HUD of its regulatory authority over Fannie and Freddie and give it to a stronger regulator.
“Fannie and Freddie finance about 40 percent of all U.S. mortgages, with $5.3 trillion in outstanding debt.
[…]
“HUD officials dispute allegations that the agency encouraged abusive lending and sloppy underwriting standards that became the hallmark of the subprime industry. Spokesman Brian Sullivan said the agency and Congress wanted to increase homeownership among underserved families and could not have predicted that subprime lending would dominate the market so quickly.”

